2 May 2013
According to figures released by the Australian Taxation Office, as at December 2012 there were nearly half a million SMSFs in Australia, run by over a million trustees and controlling a massive $474 billion in assets. Even more astounding is the fact that SMSF trustees control around 30% of all superannuation money held by Australians - only 10 years ago, this figure was closer to 10%*.When I attended the SPAA (SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia) Conference last year, the buzz was palpable. Everyone knows the SMSF train is not just coming - it's gaining momentum every day... but while some are desperately trying to not get run over, the more astute want to understand how to jump on-board.
Investors move into SMSFs for a number of reasons; one assumption is the belief they can achieve better performance managing their own investments. This is particularly true in difficult economic times, when returns are generally lower, and investors are more likely to question the fees paid to asset managers.While the reality is most investors don't achieve better performance than the professionals, unfortunately this fact doesn't lessen the challenge for asset managers. It is contingent on us to demonstrate our investment capabilities and prove our value proposition. We need to ask ourselves: "how does the investor find me?", and that means communicating our value proposition to advisers and intermediaries, but also the self-directed investors.
A focus on cost without looking at total return can be a trap for investors, who end up looking at the wrong things, and losing out as a result. And this has been a trap for SMSFs as well.I have noticed a trend towards the assumption that lower costs will be a net driver of growth, and of course, if everything in the equation stays the same, reducing costs will make profits look healthier. But cost reduction certainly isn't a long-term strategy in any business. In investments, like life, you very often get what you pay for. Low cost doesn't translate into better value or higher overall returns. Performance fees, so often held up as contrary to investor interest, can in fact make investors' desire for return and investment managers desire to perform perfectly aligned.
Investors are demanding more transparent information and better communication than ever before. According to industry analysts, improvements in administration tools have made managing your own super easier than before, and this has also contributed to the number of investors moving into the sector.
Only a few years ago, administering SMSFs was the almost exclusive domain of mid-tier accounting firms and financial advice consultancies as it was considered too time consuming, and therefore not cost effective for the larger players. However, some of the largest competitors in financial services have entered the market with a vengeance, confident that doing the administration chores will ultimately lead to profits through cross-selling of financial advice and investment products.
For boutique investment managers, like Bennelong, this doesn't spell disaster. Far from it. Our skills lie in investment management, and if we can work with the larger players so that investors, whether they be in SMSFs or not, have access to our investment capabilities, that's great.
My view is that technology allows for a closer connection between the investor and the investment solution, something that has not been possible in the same way in the past.
So ultimately, what should asset managers be doing to appeal to SMSF investors? How do they get on-board the train? Needless to say, I don't have all the answers. But the process must surely start with better communication with investors and financial intermediaries alike. Better communication around investment management, and around the value that professional investment managers can add to your total portfolio, whether or not it is held in an SMSF.
*Self-managed super funds: a statistical overview, Australian Taxation Office,
If you enjoyed this article, please share to help others find it.